WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Connecticut's first Black chief justice, Richard A. Robinson, to retire in September
Blake Lively says she dreamed up husband Ryan Reynolds as she promotes their new animated film IF
Controversial Antonio Brown pays tribute to 'legend' OJ Simpson after his death from cancer aged 76
HKFP Lens: Past Macau meets present in Portuguese photographer Gonçalo Lobo Pinheiro's images
Head of FEMA tours deadly storm damage in Houston area as more residents get power back
Dua Lipa flaunts her incredible figure in a thong bodysuit as she shares behind
Erik ten Hag admits he is relieved Harry Maguire stayed at Man United amid injury crisis
Pep Guardiola is spotted wearing a £1.1MILLION watch while managing Man City against Real Madrid
Tom Hanks' son Chet Hanks declares it will be a 'white boy summer' again
Cristiano Ronaldo swaps red card rage for beach tranquility as Al
Austrian leader lauds UK's efforts on migration and cites its plan for deportations to Rwanda
Man United legend Andy Cole accuses Mikel Arteta of 'mugging off' out